- Commenting Rules. Read these before you comment. Really. I'm not kidding.
- Sharing material from Stonekettle Station. Read this if you're thinking about reposting, linking, quoting, or just plain stealing material from Stonekettle Station. Seriously, read this before sharing, otherwise I will unleash the badgers.

- Stonekettle Station's Greatest Hits: The good stuff, it's in here!
- Reader Links: Sites recommended by readers, pimp your site today!

Monday, July 28, 2008

An open letter to the candidates

Dear Senators Obama and McCain,

First a little background, I'm a retired US Naval Officer who fought in Iraq. I was part of Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Southern Watch. I spent over two decades on active duty, a bit more than you, Senator McCain. I served as both Enlisted and as an Officer. So, you'll both understand if I consider myself something of an expert on military service and veterans in general.

We veterans swore an oath: I (state your name) do hereby solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and to bear true faith and allegiance to the same, to obey the orders of the President and the Officers appointed over me, in accordance with Naval Regulation and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. (and as an officer: and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter) So help me God."

This was a voluntary oath. As such, I and my comrades in arms swore to give our lives if necessary in the service of our country. We did not demand understanding, pity, empathy, and any other dammed thing from the citizens of the United States. Respect would be nice, but it's not necessary. We also clearly understood that our agreement with the underlying purposes of the conflicts our country engaged in was not required. We swore to obey the lawful orders of the President, whether or not we agreed with the reasons behind those orders. It is the people and the Congress' job to determine what latitude the President has when engaging in war and conflict, not ours. We go where sent, perform the missions assigned, and stay as long as ordered.

We, for the most part, do not resent this. We may not be enthusiastic about going into war, because we know better than most what the reality of war is, but we go. Because we swore to do so, because it is our duty, because it is our job, because our word is good.

Note: I cannot speak for the National Guard, their oath and their mission traditionally has been something else - and frankly if I was National Guard I would resent getting called up and sent into the meat grinder. However, I suspect that many Guardsmen feel the same as we full time veterans.

As such, you both need to understand something, and that is this:

We are not political tokens.

If you are going to be the President of the United States - and barring some unforeseen catastrophe, one of you certainly will be the next President - you need to place the needs of the country ahead of political expediency. So, with all due respect, stop attempting to curry favor and stir up political support for your individual plans by using us as a rallying point. I personally resent it, and so do many of my comrades.

If you, Senator Obama, think we should pull out of Iraq and concentrate on Afghanistan - a sentiment I personally share - fine. But do it because, as the President, you think it's the best course of action for the country, not because you want the support of the troops that would finally get to come home.

If you, Senator McCain, think we should stay the course in Iraq even if it takes the next hundred years, fine. Providing you think that is the best course of action for America, not because you can score a few points with the troops by claiming to honor their sacrifice.

Frankly, as a veteran, I have had it up to here with politicians of any stripe attempting to use us for political leverage. You both could have done a hell of lot more to support the troops, and you both could also have done a hell of a lot less. You both appear to be honorable men, each in your own way, but using those of us whom you would endeavor to lead as Commander in Chief as a token to further your agenda is dishonorable, and it should be beneath the both of you.

Knock it off.

Seriously.

14 comments:

  1. Uh...third paragraph from the bottom.

    "sentiment" not sediment.

    feel free to delete comment after fixing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, and you should send this to each campaign. Really.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Urk!

    Damn Live Writer Spell Checker, and damn lousy proof reading ability.

    Thanks, Nathan, I'll fix it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh, and you should send this to each campaign. Really.

    I have it on good authority that Obama reads my blog, every day. Sometimes he shouts "Woohoo!" and makes a fistjab when I write something he finds especially interesting.

    McCain from what I understand would - but he doesn't know how to boot up his computer. Unfortunately, he can't find a non-liberal IT type to turn the dammed thing on... So there he sits, wanting to read my blog but just plain shit out of luck. Poor guy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. OK, Fine! Send Obama a link in case he was, y'know, busy and missed it.

    Put Beastly to work chiseling it onto a scrap piece of board and have the ponies catch up to McCain on the trail.

    ReplyDelete
  6. As long as we're nitpicking spelling, there's also "Nation Guard" as the second instance of "National Guard" in the paragraph starting "Note: I cannot speak for the..."

    I completely missed "sediment" the first time through. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Friends. Can't live with 'em; can't live without 'em.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yeah, but don't forget;

    I invited you to delete my correction note and I think you've mentioned before that you'd delete someone for looking at you crosseyed. Go ahead. Cleanse your comments thread.

    (Although there won't be much left...jut sayin')

    :D

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hey - if you post a really heavily typoed blog post, we UCF 'friends' can help you break your record for most comments on a blog post!

    Aren't we a fun bunch? :D

    Seriously... you should email it to Obama. And print it out and snail mail it to McCain. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  10. pl read by blog :

    Inauspicious Time of oath by the next US President -- Hindu ...27 Jul 2008 by Shridhar

    The next US President shall take oath on 20th January, 2009 – which is observed as inauspicious time as per Vedic / Indian system of electional (Muhurt) astrology. Discussion herein is based on Indian system (Nirayana - Sidereal system) ...

    Hindu Electional Astrology - http://hinduelectionalastrology-shridhar.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  11. Folks are reading your bowls again.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Well, hell, Shridhar, where were you when the current jackass took office?

    ReplyDelete

Be sure to read the commenting rules before you start typing. Really.