Addendum at the end of the post
As noted in the previous post, I’ve been ill for the last two weeks.
Nothing life threatening, just a horrible spring cold and a touch of the flu.
But for a while there, I was wondering if maybe I’d contracted the Ebola and was in the throes of fever induced hallucinations.
Seriously, when you flip on the news and see Jeb Bush, Jeb Bush of all goddamned people, waxing philosophical and complaining about how the Republican party has moved so far into rightwing extremism that neither Ronald Reagan or his father, George Holy War Bush, would be welcome in today’s GOP, well, you really have to wonder if maybe your illness is far worse than the the doctor led you to believe.
"Ronald Reagan would have, based on his record of finding accommodation, finding some degree of common ground, as would my dad, they would have a hard time if you define the Republican party, and I don’t, as having an orthodoxy that doesn’t allow for disagreement, doesn’t allow for finding some common ground."
Bush then goes on to lament how back in his dad’s time, and especially during Reagan’s administration, “they got a lot of stuff done with a lot of bipartisan support,” but nowadays, the GOP would disown both former presidents for making the compromises they made – i.e. for putting practicality and the needs of the nation over the ideology of their own political party.
In a previous post, The Deification of Ronald Reagan, I said much the same here on Stonekettle Station. It’s long been my observation that conservatives are in love with the idea of Ronald Reagan, not the actual president himself (sort like how many of the same folks appear to regard Jesus, but I digress). As Jeb said, it’s unlikely that the real Reagan could get the GOP nomination today.
Republicans haven’t been the party of Lincoln for a long, long time, and they haven’t been the party of Teddy Roosevelt since the Taft administration – and the really scary part is that they’re no longer the party of Reagan either.
Bush cited the budget deal his father worked out with a democrat dominated congress and broad bipartisan support which “created the spending restraint of the ‘90’s” (note, I think Jeb might be stretching the definition of the word “restraint” here, but I won’t argue the point). Of course, that bipartisan deal, which raised taxes and made a mockery of George H. W. Bush’s now infamous campaign promise “read my lips, no new taxes” sent conservatives into paroxysms of apoplectic rage and ensured, as Jeb noted, that dear old dad would be a one term president. However Jeb Bush also noted that those tax increases were “helpful in creating a climate of more sustained economic growth.”
Well fancy that.
If you read the article, you’ll note that Jeb pointedly didn’t mention how his brother cut taxes or how that’s currently working out for America’s “sustained economic growth.”
Jeb Bush then called the current extremely partisan political climate “disturbing.”
That’s when I started to wonder if maybe I should have paid closer attention to those dire warnings on the bottle of cold medicine.
I mean, come on, Jeb Bush and I agree that the GOP has been taken over by a cadre of dogmatic Jesus-flinging jingoistic ass-monkeys?
Holy Hell! The end must be near!
Of course, I shouldn’t have worried.
After fortifying myself with another mug of foul tasting TheraFlu, I read the rest of the interview and the universe snapped back into its proper focus.
See, according to Bush, well, it’s all Obama’s fault.
Ah, yes, of course. He’s campaigning for vice president, I should have seen that right up front. Damned cold.
Bush went on to say that Obama’s first year in office could have been a time of great accomplishment. Could have. If only he’d been more, oh, you know, conservative. More willing to compromise. More willing to give in to republicans (of course, that’s what leftwing extremists hate about Obama the most, right? His unwillingness to give in to conservatives… oh wait, that’s not right. Never mind. These are not the public options you’re looking for, move along, move along). Bush didn’t offer an opinion on why the Congressional Tea Party Caucus and other conservative hardliners who vocally proclaimed their steadfast refusal to compromise in any fashion whatsoever are not at least partially to blame, but then he really didn’t have to, did he?
It’s the Bush Doctrine – a trait which seems to run in the family. You’re either with us or you’re against us. Period. Jeb was talking about his father, but he was talking for his neocon brother. Compromise and bipartisanship means do it our way and we won’t have any problems. Disagree and you’re a traitor to America, prepare for immediate Nazi tossing.
Now, obviously, petulant refusal to compromise and placing dogmatic adherence to political and religious ideology over national interest is hardly exclusive to conservatives, but it continues to astound me just how doggedly the right reviles Barack Obama – even if they have to make up reasons to hate him. It’s one thing to disagree with somebody because you think you can do the job better, but so many conservatives hate the president with an utterly irrational passion that goes beyond any political ideology and verges on actual madness. Birthers are one obvious example, there is no rational basis for their bizarre fixation, their ridiculous accusations have been debunked time and time again – and yet they publically and vocally persist in their baseless delusion. It’s madness.
But, you know, it’s not just the Birthers and the other obvious cases of mass hysteria, it’s the little things as well.
A conservative relative and I were discussing Obama a while back. The relative declared “Obama is just like Hitler!” Das Führer? How so? “He just is,” was the answer. Yeah, but how is he like Hitler? “He’s Hitler,” the relative insisted, getting angry. What? Did Obama invade Poland when I wasn’t looking? Did he attempt to conquer Europe? Subjugate France? Did he try to create a master race based on some goofy medieval Germanic fairytale and a half-assed misunderstanding of evolutionary biology? Is it the little mustache? Gosh darn it, did he kill six million Jews? Is that it? Really what? “Hitler! Hitler! I just feel that’s how he is. Hitler.” And that’s where we left it because there is no polite response to irrational behavior. How in the hell can you reason with that? They might as well have been proclaiming their belief in alien abductions or the healing power of “magnetic” copper bracelets.
You just can’t reason with unreasonable people.
Case in point, Bloomberg Business Week posted a piece complaining about a joke Obama made at George Clooney’s expense, a joke that apparently got a lot of laughs at a recent fundraiser but wasn’t factually true (Yeah, new rule, political jokes during a celebrity roast now need to be factually correct – somebody call Don Rickles). Because really, that’s the level of petty peevishness you want in your financial reporting.
An aside: is it just me or is there no end of hysterical irony in a bunch of creationists insisting on provable facts? No? Just me, huh? Ok.
The president ribbed a famous celebrity who also happens to be one of his personal friends and a supporter, cracking wise in an obvious joke, and Bloomberg declares this an egregious example of the White House’s lack of “fact checking.” Ironically, the Business Week article ends with the author speculating on how the White House Press Office was “probably fairly embarrassed” by the whole thing (emphasis mine). Probably. No actual facts to back that up in an article where you’re complaining about fact checking, but yeah let’s just go ahead and guess at what the White House is feeling. Probably. Sure. Of course, it’s not like Business Week’s readers are really interested in actual facts, people engaged in irrational behavior rarely are. Under the piece in question (linked to above), commenter Michael is a pretty good example of the kind of people Bloomberg was aiming this article at:
“Some of you people do not have a clue, This country was founded on religious
freedoms and Obama is doing his best to destroy what rights we have left of
that freedom. It canceled nationa prayer day, is working with Hillary
Clinton to take away our right to bare arms and turn gun control over to the
United Nations. NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO TAKE OUR RIGHTS AWAY.
Wake up it is time to stop blame Bush for everything. Obama is a rookie that
is a proven lier and does not meet the qualification to be President of the
United States of American.” [sic]
Mike’s comment went up three days ago and so far one hundred and eighty-five Bloomberg readers have given him a “like” on Facebook. At least they know why they hate Obama – he’s destroying religious freedom by cancelling National Prayer Day! Why that Nazi bastard! He’s just like Hitler!
Except, of course, “National Prayer Day” wasn’t cancelled.
The actual fact is that President Obama has issued a proclamation observing the “National Prayer Day” for each of the three years of his presidency – just like every other president before him all the way back to Truman in 1952. What? What’s that you say? Oh, yes, that’s right, it’s the National Day of Prayer, not “Nationa[l] Prayer Day” but hey, at this point under an article about fact checking the president’s Clooney joke we’ve already pegged the irony meter anyway so what the hell, eh? (Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Forget it, he’s rolling. – Two points if you get the ref without looking it up on IMDB and help yourself to some punch and cookies).
In point of fact, the Obama administration went to court in 2010 to defend the National Day of Prayer against a constitutional challenge. I guess the outraged evangelical chain mail going around forgot to mention that. Apparently the bearing of false witness isn’t a sin for Christians after all so long as they’re doing it from the pulpit, somebody want to double check with Jesus on that just to be sure?
Look, even if he wanted to, the president can’t cancel the “National Prayer Day”, just as the president can’t make you observe the obnoxious event either. The president can’t cancel the National Day of Prayer anymore than he can cancel Christmas or the 4th of July or Abraham Lincoln’s birthday. Seriously, if this silly prayer day thing is so damned important, you’d think people would actually look it up and learn something about it and then pass that information around in order to allay other believers’ fears and false information – since it’s supposed to be truth that matters to these people, I mean. Isn’t prayer supposed to be about comfort and guidance? And the National Day of Prayer is supposed to be about encouraging Americans to turn to the divine for said comfort and inspiration? Yes? But what have certain Christians turned it into? Another opportunity to spread hate and fear and false information – I’m pretty sure Jesus would kick your ass for that. And it’s not like the actual information is hard to find in this modern age. But the simple truth of the matter is that these people want to believe this kind of crap. They need a reason to justify their fear and hatred of Obama, even if they have to make that reason up whole cloth. This is a natural result of creationist thinking: 1) consult dogma for the desired result, 2) rationalize up some “facts” to support it (Step 3, get Texas to put it in the school books – and now I’m just being a smart Alec. Sorry).
But let’s not stop there, as long as we’re just making shit up, let’s toss in a fib about Barry and Hillary scheming to take away our right to wear sleeveless shirts too!
Huh? Oh. See, Mike said “right to bare arms” and I thought … Oh, heh heh, sorry. So they’re coming to get our guns? Oh noes! Not the guns!
Obama’s coming for our guns and our religion!
Oh that Barack, what a stinker.
Remember back when Midwestern conservatives got all soggy and hard to light when candidate Obama said something about them clinging to their guns and their religion? Boy, was he ever wrong, wasn’t he? So, is it just a coincidence that guns and religion are always the first, and often the only, rights conservatives worry about? When folks like Michael complain about Obama taking away our rights, they never mention the right to petition the government for redress of wrongs, or freedom of the press, or protection from the quartering of troops in our homes, or freedom from self incrimination or the right to a speedy trial. Nope, it’s God and guns first and second, and maybe a passing reference to state’s rights a distant third (because states are better at protecting God and guns, see?). Why is that, do you suppose? Think about it for a minute, which right to do you think will yield actual results? The right to gather in your church and ask Jehovah to turn the onrushing tide (which by definition He sent in some sort of cosmic act of extortion apparently) or the right to petition the government for redress when the Corps of Engineers fails to secure the seawall? Which right do you think is more likely to bring down, has brought down, a corrupt Administration? Freedom to own a firearm or freedom of the press? Do you really think that you and your raggedy-assed band of beer-bellied militia brothers, all ten of you waving your pistols and bibles, are going to stand against the US military and law enforcement if the government really wants you? Really? What’s that? Oh, your neighbors will rally to your cause? Like Braveheart maybe, For Frrrrrreeeeeedom! Yeah, those same neighbors you can’t stand and wish would leave the country, right? But yeah, guns and god, those are the two most important rights. Especially guns.
Of course, there isn’t a single bill presently before either the House or the Senate that would restrict Second Amendment rights. Not one. Nor has President Obama advocated for one. And in fact, the last gun related bill taken up was HR 822, which passed the House in November of 2011 with a comfortable margin of 272 yeas to 154 nays (note that to get 272 to 154, a significant number of liberals had to vote for the bill, but I digress). What is HR 822? Well, if it becomes law it would allow you to carry a concealed handgun anywhere in the United States providing that you have a valid concealed carry permit in your state of residence – kind of like how your state driver’s license lets you operate a motor vehicle in any other state you happen to be passing through. HR 822 would significantly expand gun carry rights across the board. One of the bill’s sponsors was North Carolina’s Heath Schuler, a democrat. Those opposed to the bill wrote to the White House urging Obama to issue a veto threat, he refused and took no official position. The measure is working it’s way through the Senate presently. But yeah, Obama, he’s coming for our guns. Him and Hillary Clinton – because, as any good God-fearin’ American knows, the Secretary of State can do things like that. All liberals can, it’s their magic super power. See, they want our guns and our god so they can turn “control” over to the United Nations! Yeah. Just like Hitler did.
Of course, what do you expect from a guy who doesn’t even meet the qualifications for president, right?
Again, you can not reason with unreasonable people.
It’s madness that every single thing Michael fears, every single line he wrote, is provably false and as utterly irrational as any other phobia. Sure he has a right to believe the nonsense he posted in his comment – despite the very fact that being able to freely speak such paranoid bilge without consequence is proof that he’s wrong. Sure he has a right to believe it, he also has the right to be an idiot. The worst kind of idiot, a willful idiot. Because his cognitive defect isn’t something he was born with – he deliberately chose to be an idiot. That’s not just stupid, that’s pitiful.
It’s madness that people like Michael have to literally make up reasons to hate and fear the president – and by extension half the country. Oh sure, we’ve been making up irrational reasons to hate and fear each other since before we climbed down from the trees. None of Michael’s fears can stand the light of reason but that doesn’t keep him from being afraid anyway, from wanting to be afraid. Sure he has a right to act like a gibbering panic monkey caught between fright and flight, baring his teeth in a rictus of fear and hate simian-like at whomever he wants to. But he’s the worst kind of hater, he hates from reflex. All of the justifications for his fear are false, provably so. He doesn’t even know why he hates – he just does.
It’s madness that Michael is hardly alone in his irrational beliefs. He’s got plenty of company in his fear and hatred of Obama, from the other commenters on the same article to conservative talk radio pundits to prominent businessmen with bad hair right on up to members of congress. Sure he has the right to say what he likes no matter how false and irrational. And sure others have the right to agree with him and repeat his words – just as he blindly repeats somebody else’s. But it’s the worst kind of togetherness, it’s the togetherness of mass hysteria, it’s the group think of the mindless stampeding herd, it’s the mob mentality of irrational fear, and it’s the subjugation of reason to the hypocritical dogma of the clergy and the shaman and the huckster. It is fear of the dark (literally in this case), fear of the unknown, fear of the other – it is the small whimpering terror of a small child afraid of what might be hiding under the bed.
And it’s madness that politicians and pundits deliberately prey on the fear and hatred of the foolishly weak minded like Michael. These people proclaim the greatness of America, the strength of its institutions, the enduring exceptionalism of its very existence, and above all its favored position in the mighty baleful eye of their fearsome God, and yet – and yet – they have so little faith in their nation, their institutions, their system of governance, their ideals, and all the things their ancestors wrought, they have so little faith in their assertion that their God loves America best of all, that they fear one single man can destroy it all with a simple wave of his dark-skinned hand.
It is the madness of fear for fear’s sake and nothing more.
Democracy depends for its very existence on an educated and informed citizenry.
A republic depends on educated and informed and rational representatives of the people.
In the United States, no president can take away your freedoms or your rights. No president can destroy the nation.
But willful idiots and fearful fools like Michael most certainly can.
You know some days you just have to wonder at serendipity.
Two of my favorite journalists are NPR’s Terry Gross and The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer.
Today on Fresh Air, Terry Gross interviewed Jane Mayer about her latest piece in The New Yorker. It’s a fascinating and appalling article about Bryan Fischer, the extremist evangelical (is that redundant?) talk-radio host who has become the driving force behind the GOP’s hard shift to the far right. There are few republican candidates, Romney chief among them, who don’t out and out fear Fischer – because he directly influences a very large segment of Midwestern/Southern Evangelicals, without whom no conservative candidate stands a prayer in hell of winning the White House. Fischer is considered by many to wield far more actual power and influence than even Rush Limbaugh.
Fischer is vehemently anti-gay, you might say he’s obsessed with gays and has even declared war on homosexuals. Fischer is specifically responsible for the campaign against Richard Grenell, an openly gay man who served for nine days as Romney’s security advisor and spokesman before being forced to resign amidst an appalling display of fear and open hatred (yes, one has to wonder what the hell a openly gay man was doing in the middle of a republican campaign in the first place – typically Republicans like to keep their gays confined to airport bathrooms and secret junkets to Cancun, but I digress).
Fischer wants to literally implement biblical law in America, this isn’t hyperbole it is actual fact and an understated one at that.
Fischer believes that the constitution applies only to Christians, again this is not hyperbole or an exaggeration but an exact quote of his publically expressed belief.
He’s a racist of the most vicious stripe.
He and his organization, The American Family Association, are labeled a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
And he is the source of much of the misinformation many, many conservatives now parrot as “fact” including most of the things I pointed out in my post above.
Least you think that my analysis of the Evangelical right, and increasingly the entire GOP itself, is off base, take a look at one of the most influential voices within the modern American Republican party. Then get back to me. // Jim
"one single man can destroy it all with a simple wave of his dark-skinned hand."ReplyDelete
To my mind, this line sums up why their fear takes this form. If they could go back to wearing their bedsheets with the eyes cut out for holes, they would express themselves that way.
But that's not allowed, nor politically expedient anymore, is it? :/
Not PC to actually kill those tainted with tint, so let's just make lies up about them. Especially the Black Man In The White House.
::sighs:: I'm sure if we started building a wall now, we could have it done before November...
Their wives have been buying pastel bedsheets and those make a real man look funny.Delete
I have bare arms here in the southern part of the west coast. Just wanted to get that out there because I am not a lier in the sun. Nor am I a liar.ReplyDelete
Well written and I always like your argumentation.
Thanks for taking that TheraFlu. I'm sure I'm not the only one who missed you.
TheraFlu may have dulled your miseries, but did nothing to dull that sharp tongue polished reasoning!ReplyDelete
Good to know you are back in fine fettle.
What really worries me these days is this stuff is turning out to be infectious and we're seeing outbreaks of it up here in sunny socialist Canuckistan. And the only thing I get when I bare arms here is goosebumps so maybe I'm doing it wrong? Roll on November and may the human race win.ReplyDelete
That durned Main-Stream Liberal Media! (?)ReplyDelete
IMO Hilary would actually be more objectionable than Obama to these morons, based on the conservatives treatment of women so far. Unlikely as that seems.
Why does pandering to ignorance and fear work so well in the greatest country in the world? Is it the Thera-flu in the water? Are we programmed as children to accept authority? OK, that last one was a gimme.
What can we do about it other than point at the naked dude and laugh?
Stay calm, and speak the truth, like Jim.
(Romney's running mate is still going to be Portman, BTW. Sorry, Jeb.)
This site contains a free online book written by Robert Altemeyer a retired Psychology at the University of Manitoba. He has studied and written extensively on right wing authoritarianism. This book explains how and why these people think the way they do. Take a look at it if you are interested, but prepare to be afraid for our future...very afraid.
Interesting that you mentioned the states righters. I often wonder where the people who claim they support states rights were when Attorney General John Ashcroft overruled the NYS Attorney General in a state case where he had no jurisdiction in order to keep a religiously motivated terrorist assassin OUT of New York's electric chair.ReplyDelete
NY has not had a death penalty, except for the murder of a police officer, since 1965 and has not had an execution since 63; and it has been lethal injection since 1995, so I don't see how Ashcroft kept somebody from NY's electric chair.Delete
If you really want to piss off the pro-gun, States-Rights crowd, point out that a shining, working example of the kind of Government model they're proposing is modern-day Somalia.Delete
But for a while there, I was wondering if maybe I’d contracted the EbolaReplyDelete
You're in luck! They may have discovered a cure for Ebola!
That wasn't the point? Sorry.
As always, i stand in awe of your hilarious and biting wit. :DReplyDelete
Sadly, when I was in AK a few weeks back, on the road trip with my old-lady friends to Valdez, they both in conversation said that they believe that the government was trying to take away the right to bear arms because of what the NRA says. Way too many otherwise intelligent people apparently would rather believe the NRA, even though the NRA has been going to crazy town for some time now.
Unfortunately, in the car I didn't have any actual facts at my disposal (memory being what it is) and I wasn't able to shut them down. So I had to just agree to disagree. But I found it very depressing..
Karen, email them or send them copies of this via snail mail.Delete
I'm keeping my guns, I'm keeping my concealed carry permit. I'm not keeping with the NRA, the lies are too much to carry.
So glad you're back and in fine form.ReplyDelete
So, you're already married, and I have no use for the institution, but if those things weren't true, I'd propose to you now just because you said this:ReplyDelete
Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Forget it, he’s rolling. –
Many good wishes for your improving health, good sir.ReplyDelete
Mmmm, punch and cookies. Nom nom nom. (said with mouthful of cookies)"Guess what I am?"ReplyDelete
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.Delete
You two are now on double secret probation.Delete
I think it was a mouth full of jelloDelete
Mashed potatoes. I'm a zit. Get it?Delete
It was a hard-boiled egg.Delete
And, if memory serves, it was a piece of cake.Delete
2 Minutes and 60 seconds in. I think Steve is right, but the video is too crappy to really tell.Delete
See if you can guess what I am now...
"so many conservatives hate the president with an utterly irrational passion that goes beyond any political ideology and verges on actual madness."ReplyDelete
You hit the nail on the head with that one. As a card-carrying liberal, I'm disappointed that Obama's first term has really been GW Bush's third term. If conservatives actually, you know, thought, they'd realize that he is far from (what did New Gingrich call him?) "the most radical president in American history."
But can you ride your motorcycle up the stairs and then play "throat music"?ReplyDelete
You HAVE no grade point average.
Jim, regarding your addendum:ReplyDelete
I do not know if you have seen it yet, but the Summer 2012 Intelligence Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center is out. I receive it, because I support SPLC. Its fifty pages are filled with vital information on the doings of radicals like Patriots, Sovereigns, Neo Nazis and other assortments of groups fanning hatred.
This summer's headline article is "30 to WATCH", which updates information, in alphabetical order, on the most radical characters, including David Barton and Brian Fisher. It is a short, no-nonsense report and a must-read.
SPLC is an admirable organization, staffed by courageous people. For anyone reading here who is not familiar with their mission, you can find them at splcenter.org
I found the NPR interview Terry Gross and Jayne Mayer very interesting. If Brian Fisher wants no standards, no inteference with those who home school, poor kids. They'll never learn enough to even approach their peers. The kids miss interaction with other ideas and their intellect will be stunted. Good interview about a scary guy.Delete
Jim, It is just really great to see you back. I have no fear of mis-speaking when I say we all missed you. Stay well, shipmate!ReplyDelete
The GOP leaders say they hate "elitists" (except for themselves), or at least pander to those who say they do. Santorum expressed disdain for a college education in spite of having several degrees. Romney said he would do "nothing" to help college students, and gave advice to find a cheaper school. I think this is because thinking for yourself is counter to right wing authoritarianism (and religion) (and corporate marketing). This may be why evolution, global warming, teachers, and the teachers union are all under attack by the GOP, right wing think tanks, corporate owners *and* religious leaders. Logical thinking makes me vote against the GOP, vote against religion intruding on public schools, and vote for regulations on corporations. I have said before that I might have been a Republican if only they actually did what they said instead of the opposite (fiscal responsibility instead of debt, conserving instead of tax breaks for mountain top removal, promoting family values instead of hate), i.e. lying. (I would not vote Republican if you paid me _and_ threatened me at the same time. I am a patriot.) If only we had Senator Blutarsky instead of the obstructionist ideological idiots there now.ReplyDelete
VOTE Senator Blutarsky "I AM A Zit."ReplyDelete
"Germans....Pearl Harbor" Bluto/Belushi in Animal House - No IMDB. Gimme my damn cookies. You promised me COOKIES!!ReplyDelete
Too bad Reconstruction wasn't directed by Thaddeus Stephens and Charles Sumner. We missed the chance to civilize that part of the country.ReplyDelete
Jim - Sorry to hear about your summer cold cause "It's a different animal". If any of you remember that jingle then you are weeping for the future (damn these movie quotes).ReplyDelete
Serious question - Do you Jim, or the other readers believe that this country can recover from the flat spin that our nation has adopted?
Since the first Reagan years (and the growth of new style GOP hate tactics) the explosion of targeted communication throughput, allied with a decrease in attention span and actual knowledge, have enabled the spawn of the low-information, dogmatic creatures of your column.
"Citizens United". The increasingly conservative lifetime judiciary. The bought and paid for Congress and State Houses. They all legitimize the increasing influence of the 1% in molding and driving the events and attitudes of the masses. The "New Improved Stupid" born from NCLB, political religion and the convenience of blaming others has developed a new generation of credulous fools acting against their own interests, to advance the advantages of "Job Creators" and Real Americans. (Not that Kenyan, Muslim, Nazi, Communist who stole the White House.)
Do we have a chance to restart the engines, establish control and help get on top of the global situation? Or, do you think that we are truly damned to live through the descent into some new, irrational American way? Driven by the god-like mandates and interests of the hyper-wealthy, enabled by the directionless howling of the fact-free masses of peasants and wage-slaves? But then...I'm an optimist.
Note - We saw Bonnie Raitt sing last night. She noted that this is an election year, or rather an "Auction Year"! Great statement followed by cheers and applause.
I think we are recovering. It takes time. Pain, as they say, is weakness leaving the body. People need to adapt to new ways of looking at things. Except for new ways of looking at funny cat pictures.Delete
"gibbering panic monkey"-I am SO claiming this, I'll let you borrow it on occasion, however.ReplyDelete
I thought it was Nancy Pelosi coming for our guns? When did Hillary get in on the act? Was there a bitchfest and Hill won? Was it televised? How come I never get to witness the good stuff?
Fear not, fair Chief! I think your writing suffers not from illness, nor the idiocy of idjits. I would suggest "shooting them all and let Dog sort them out", but that would eat into my supply of ammunition and you just KNOW "THEY" are coming for that next! I'm saving mine for the Acropolis, the Mayans tell me it's a-comin'.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLtRHN7fsgY This is just an excuse to post one of my favourite tracks by one of my heroes, Gil Scott Heron. Here's to clean living in difficult circumstances.ReplyDelete
That's a great bit, Long Ben. Thanks!Delete
When you say "radical right" today, I think of these moneymaking ventures by fellows like Pat Robertson and others who are trying to take the Republican Party away from the Republican Party, and make a religious organization out of it. If that ever happens, kiss politics goodbye.ReplyDelete
-- Barry Goldwater, 1994
I always laugh when reading how Reagan wouldn't be allowed into the party today, because it's changed so, in the intervening years. I have a different recollection of Reagan, it seems. Reagan was the one who ignored a congressional mandate, passed in both Houses, and signed by himself into law, namely the Boland Amendment. In that instance, he clearly ignored both the wishes of Congress, and the members of his own party in congress who voted for it. Even at that time he was out of step, and willing to go against a bill he himself had signed into law, to further a political goal. In that regard, he would fit well in today's conservative movement, for they are at least as politically confused, and incoherent, as the guy who sold weapons to terrorists to affect the release of hostages, and used the money to fund Rightist South American kill squads.ReplyDelete
Nothing gives more pleasure to Karl Rove, the Kock Brothers, Dick Armey and the rest of the wrecking crew than to scatter some pesos and give the order to the unwashed mouth breathers to "Dance monkey boy, dance!"ReplyDelete
Mitch McConnell just called Obama and Dems "thugs" and a threat to the 1st Amendment for wanting to know who contributes mega-bucks under Citizen United campaign financing. Mitch is just doing his job to the best that he can; taking orders and building up the interests of his masters. Just like every other Congress Critter. (Most "elected" reps are good at hiding their doggy style money love. Some openly revel in dismantling the union for the benefit of our betters.)
Check out George Carlin. He says it all: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wV1lZMTCqf8
Get better soon Jim. You need to be in shape when they ship you off to the reeducation camp.
Great stuff as usual. I have been in so many conversations like your "he's hitler..damn it" (Oklahoma) that I have basicly just given up. Romney couldn't lose this state if he held a prayer breakfast where the main courses consisted entirely of baby Mcmuffins and puppy smoothies.ReplyDelete
We are no longer talking about an ideology or a movement or even a political party at this point: They are a cult..by any definition of the word. The exception being that apparently they don't require any sort of charismatic leader to feed their unhinged belief system. But... they sure have the scapegoating element down pat. The Kenyan usurper is a nice tidy blame package for them. Fear based, irrational hatred. Poo slinging monkeys....
I remember when Republicans were calling Saddam Hussein "a Hitler" to justify the first Gulf War. Under Bush 1 no less.ReplyDelete
Funny how history repeats sometimes.
Animal House . . . thanks for the snacks!ReplyDelete
I'm just a simple atheist son of a preacher, but I don't think the bible means what that guy thinks it means.ReplyDelete