Is it just me? Well?

It's just me, right?

I'm the crazy one. Obviously.

I read the news in the morning and I watch rich and powerful men with million dollar diplomas from Ivy League schools, men elected to run this country, men in thousand dollar suits and power ties, the fast movers and the shit shakers. And I listen to the words coming out of their smiling mouths and I think there is no way they can be this consistently inconsistent, no way they can continue to spout such nonsense and get away with it, no way they can continue to make such obviously self-serving decisions and not get called on it.

Surely, I think, Americans can't be buying this nonsense. Surely, today Americans are going to stop, scratch their collective heads and say, "Heeeeey, wait just one damn minute..." And yet every single day, the powerful men spew more silly nonsense and a significant fraction of Americans nod their heads and just let them get away with it.

From this morning's news feed:

Bush Presses House to Approve Bill on Surveillance: “There is no reason why Republicans and Democrats in the House cannot pass the bill immediately,” the President said from the White House. He added that failure to pass the bill “will jeopardize the security of our citizens.” OK, I don't even remotely agree with this unconstitutional travesty and I've justified my position elsewhere in prior posts, but maybe I can see how Bush and members of Congress can think that our security is in such dire peril that it has to be done. They are supposed to know things, have access to information - so maybe they know something I don't. I doubt it, this used to be my profession after all, but just maybe surveillance of US citizen's overseas phone calls without a warrant, without due adherence to the founding principles of this country, are necessary. The world changes, maybe the Constitution is a tad outdated. Hey, it once codified slavery, so maybe, just maybe, the 4th Amendment doesn't apply in this age of modern electronic communications. I don't think this is the case, but these men are supposed to know - that's what we pay them for. I don't like it, in fact I loath the idea of unfettered governmental power over it's citizens, but in time of war maybe I can see how the President might feel it necessary. I'll continue to speak out about it, I'll raise merry hell with my representatives over it, and if it passes I'll grit my teeth and live with it until such time as it is over turned. But just maybe I can understand why these men might think it necessary.

Then I'm asked to believe this:

White House Pushes Waterboarding Rationale: "Any technique that you use, you use it under certain circumstances. It was something that they felt at that time was necessary, and they sought legal guidance to make sure that it was legal and that it was effective," says the White House. Again, I think torture - and make no mistake, that is exactly what we're talking about here - is contrary to everything this country stands for. I've written extensively about this subject and my opinion on the matter hasn't changed. I despise the fact that my country, the country I spent two decades risking my life for, has become a nation that tortures human beings. However, I can understand how in the aftermath of 911, in a contrived climate of fear and war and terror, Americans might be convinced that the ends do indeed justify the means in certain cases. I emphatically don't agree, but I can understand how others might think so. I think those people are incredibly short sighted, I think they are dangerously naive and foolish, I think that they have little comprehension of history or how often and inevitably those means grow rapidly, like a cancer, far, far beyond the original justification, and how such capricious and unchecked power in the hands of a few leads directly and inevitably to tyranny. I think these people have been manipulated, have allowed themselves to be manipulated - but I can understand how and why, and why they believe that it just might be acceptable to strap a naked man to a board and pour water up his nose, or zap him with electricity, or menace him with snarling dogs, or flush his holy books down the toilet. I think it is an abomination of the highest order, but I can understand how others might think it justified.


All of this and more, much more, to make America safe. To protect us from those who would do us harm. It's war, and things have to be done in war. Yes? I don't like it and I don't agree with this or the thousand other things that have been done in our name over the last eight years, but again I can understand why the administration and a majority of our representatives might think this is the proper course of action.

So, what the fuck is this?

Facing a rapidly growing backlog of immigration cases, the Bush administration will grant permanent residency to tens of thousands of legal U.S. immigrants without first completing required background checks against the FBI's investigative files.

You want to run that by me again? Instead of fixing the problems with the bloated, hamstrung, Gordian-knot bureaucracy of the FBI and the rest of our jury-rigged intelligence system, we're just going to drop background checks for immigrants? Instead of holding the director of the FBI and his band of steely-eyed, square-jawed good ole boys responsible for fixing the mess their mismanagement and their rice-bowl grabbing feudalistic mentality has gotten their agency into, the White House says screw it, just hand out the green cards.

We've got enough extra dough laying around to hand out $168 billion in bonus checks, but we don't have enough to fix the background check process? We've got the money and assets to monitor American's phones calls, email, snail mail, and travel plans, but we don't have the assets to fix the background check process? We're in such desperate straits that we can kick the Constitution and our ideals of freedom and liberty to the curb, but we don't have the wherewithal to do the background checks on foreign nationals living within our own boarders?

It's just me, right?

Attention White House dipshits: failure to conduct proper investigations and background checks is what led directly to the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001 in the first fucking place. Issuing student visas and permanent residency cards to Mohammad Atta and his murderous brethren without complete background checks, and then failing to follow up on them despite numerous suspicious indicators and red flags is precisely what led directly to the deaths of over 6000 Americans (and counting, 3000 on 911, and 3000 KIA in the following war).

Don't get me wrong here. I have nothing against immigrants, and I welcome them to the United States and applaud the courage it takes to pick up and move to a foreign country in search of a better life. My great grandparents were immigrants. I believe whole heartedly that America's greatest strength is in her diversity. And I believe that the vast majority of people who come to America in search of a better life are good folks who will add to our strength and our future. But, there are a small percentage who come here for the express purpose of doing us harm, they are foreign agents, terrorists, criminals, and the whole damned reason that we've justified the suppression of the Bill of Rights and our treatment of the detainees captured in this war on terrorism.

The solution is not to just hand out green cards, the solution is to fix the process. There's no excuse in this day and age of instantaneous communication and data retrieval why the back ground check process cannot be streamlined.

But, again, it's just me. Isn't it?

I really don't like this guy, seriously

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad asked permission to lay a wreath at the World Trade Center site when he comes to New York City next week.

Permission was denied.

"President Ahmadinejad intended to lay a wreath at the site of ground zero in order to pay tribute to the victims of the terrorists attack of Sept. 11, 2001," said Mohammad Mir Ali Mohammadi, spokesman for the Iranian mission to the U.N.

You've got to be kidding me.

Pay tribute to the victims of the terrorist attacks? It's a foregone conclusion that Ahmadinejad intends to use his visit to the UN as a way to kick the US in the teeth, but visit Ground Zero and pay tribute to dead Americans? This makes no sense to me, until suddenly the light goes off in my head. Sure, he intended to pay tribute - to Mohamed Atta and his 18 buddies.

Choke on your tribute, Ahmadinejad, say your peace at the UN and then go home. The last thing America needs is your tribute.