Houston, Tranquility Base here…the Eagle has landed.
Forty years ago today, the entire world listened as Neil Armstrong spoke those words from the surface of the Moon.
Eagle, that fragile tinker-toy of a spaceship, had just set down on the dusty regolith of the Mare Tranquillitatis and it wasn’t just Mission Control who had been holding their collective breath, but the entire population of planet Earth – with those words, we all started breathing again.
In that one moment, the entire human race was as close to united as it has ever been, black, white, brown, yellow and red, Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, atheists, and agnostics, from the most sophisticated rocket scientists at NASA and Star City to the most primitive bushman, capitalists and communists and socialists and the left and the right and the undecided all stared at the moon in abject wonder and shivered at the smallness of man against the vast and terrible backdrop of the universe. They cried and they cheered and they hugged random strangers in the streets. They marveled at what men could do if only they dared dream big enough and they all wished the crew of Apollo 11 Godspeed.
A few hours later we watched as Armstrong and Aldrin opened the hatch and descended the ladder and made the first foot prints on the surface of a world other than Earth.
There was a silver plaque mounted on the side of the LEM’s descent stage, it said:
Here, men from the planet Earth
first set foot upon the moonJuly 1969 A.D.
We came in peace, for all mankind.
Beneath those words were the signatures of Apollo 11’s crew, Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Buzz Aldrin, and the President of the United States, Richard Nixon.
It was as if ten thousand years of recorded history, of centuries of scientific advance, of decades of effort, and the dreams of millions had come together in that one moment solely in order to place that message on the surface of another world. You could feel it. Hell, even as a seven year old kid, I could feel it. In that moment the world was different – men had walked upon the surface of another world and everything was about to change. Before that pivotal event our dreams had been limited to the near horizons of Earth, but in that moment our vision was limitless and the whole universe spread out before us. Mars would be next, and the moons of Jupiter, and then Saturn. There was talk of ships that could lift whole colonies, hundreds of people, into space, Orion, rising on a column of atomic fire and even of an unmanned probe to the near stars, Daedalus.
Men had walked on the Moon and there was nothing that we could not do.
It sounds impossible now, ships like Orion, giant stations in orbit wheeling against the stars, colonies on the moon, on Mars – but in 1969 it didn’t seem so. Less than eight years before, John F. Kennedy gave his famous speech, “We choose to go to the Moon. We chose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things not because they are easy but because they are hard!” Damn straight. And we did. We kept the promise and the vision of a murdered president, a promise made in one of the darkest hours of our history, the Cuban Missile Crisis. We kept the promise despite the turmoil of that terrible decade, the battle for civil rights, the radically changing culture, the Cold War and the Vietnam War and the threat of imminent nuclear Armageddon. And in less than nine years we went from barely making it into low Earth orbit to the Moon itself.
We choose to go to the moon, you damned right we do.
In 1969, nothing seemed impossible. We would walk the surface of other worlds, we would build our homes there and birth our children there and dream our own dreams. People believed.
Armstrong, Aldrin, and Collins came home to parades and the adulations of billions. Six missions followed them to the moon, five landed.
But, by 1974 it was over, all of it.
The hippy dreams of the sixties were lost in the reality of drug addiction and venereal disease and Charlie Mason, Nixon had resigned in disgrace, and we had retreated from Vietnam leaving 50,000 of our countrymen dead on the battlefield. And in far less than five years flights to the moon had become so routine, so boring, that they weren’t even covered by the media. In that five years the dreamers and the engineers and the scientists and the astronauts and the men with the Right Stuff were replaced with accountants and administrators and bureaucrats and those with no imagination.
Somewhere in that five years the dreams of 1969 died and no one even noticed.
The last men to walk on the moon, Gene Cernan and Jack Schmitt, lifted off in their ship Challenger from the Sea of Serenity on December 14th, 1972. And when they, and Command Ship pilot Ron Evans, returned to Earth in America, it would be the last time human beings would leave low Earth orbit.
There were supposed to be three more missions, Apollo 18, 19, 20 – and follow on programs after that, building on the success of Apollo.
The ship that would have become Apollo 18, a fully operational moonship, rests on its side now, moldering and covered in bird shit on the grass in front of Johnson Space Flight Center – The mightiest machine ever built by the hands of man, a ship designed to land men on the surface of another world and bring them home safely again, the culmination of the skill and daring and dreams of millions is now nothing more than the largest and most expensive lawn decoration in the history of mankind. A testament to failed dreams and the cowardice of politicians and the small horizons our children are born beneath today.
Pieces of the ship that might have become Apollo 19 rest now in a similar display on the lawn in front of Kennedy Space Center. That display is made of bits and pieces, some operational and some not, a junk sculpture made from the debris of our dreams, things that could have been and never were.
Apollo 20 was never built, the command module and lunar modules were scrapped, the uncompleted carcasses dumped in a landfill. Pieces of the Apollo program were locked away forgotten in dusty storerooms or sold off to museums. Some components were later used for Skylab and the Apollo-Soyuz rendezvous – sort of like using a semi-truck to deliver the mail and just about as foolish and wasteful.
I’ve been to the Air and Space Museum at the Smithsonian in Washington DC and I’ve seen the Apollo 11 Command Module, Columbia, scarred and pitted, resting beside the great machines of history, the Wright Flyer, The Spirit of St. Louis, The Bell X-1, the Voyager, and Spaceship One and the sight brings tears to my eyes for all the things man has dared and done. And I’ve been to Florida and Texas and I’ve seen our future out there rusting in the sun and the rain and the sight fills me with revulsion and disgust and sadness for all the things we could have done, and did not.
As a kid, I heard great men say that the stars would belong to my generation, I watched brave men walk on the surface of another world and dared to believe that I too would do so some day. That belief has filled me with wonder my whole life and driven me to far ends of the Earth in search of adventure and mystery and far distant shores. That desire filled me with great dreams and instilled in me a belief that men can achieve anything if they only believe, if they only have the courage to try, if they only have the will to seek new horizons and push the edge of the safe and the known. I firmly believe that the meek shall inherit the Earth, and that they are welcome to it - but the rest of the universe belongs to those willing to risk all in order to see what is beyond the next hill.
As a teenager, I watched cowardly men protest that the cost was too great and the price too high, and I watched those selfish fearful sons of bitches dismantle the space program and turn our future into lawn ornaments. I wondered then, and I still wonder now, how if we cannot afford to build a future for all of mankind how then can we afford to spend twice as much in order to build those weapons that would destroy all of mankind? In the last thirty years we Americans have built exactly five manned spacecraft. Five, and one of those only as a grudging replacement for the lost Challenger. Columbia we chose not to replace. Soon, America will depend solely on Russian built craft and have no manned ships of her own at all. In the last thirty years however, we've built thousands of nuclear bombs. Thousands. We've built hideously expensive invisible airplanes that we can't even use. We are even now dismantling many of those bombs and missiles and I am grateful that it is so, but, my God, the colossal waste, the colossal folly of it all. Funny that we can afford to build our own destruction, but not our own future. Funny, and tragic, and ironic, isn’t it?
As an adult I’ve watched our halfhearted efforts to stay in space, to keep thirty year old technology flying, and build a space station that instead of housing thousands, or even hundreds, or even tens, can barely support three - ironically the same number who went to the moon in a tiny capsule four decades ago and the same number who flew onboard Skylab twenty five years ago. Three seems to be the limit of NASA’s vision. As an adult I've watched as robots and machines roll across alien land in place of the men and woman who sent them, and it is no more exciting or inspiring than watching a video game. As an adult I’ve watched my dreams fade and die and know that I will never walk the surface of another world, and yet I look up there at the moon and still dare hope that some day we will see the lights of cities shining back from that shadowed crescent.
You know, it wouldn’t bother me so damned much if we had tried and failed. But we didn’t fail. We did it, we went to the moon, we could have gone to Mars and beyond.
And then we just quit.
We gave up.
Thirty eight years ago, we turned our backs on Kennedy’s vision. We didn’t do the things that were hard. We did the easy part, and then we walked away. And I see that legacy all around me here in America today, the failure to face the challenges, to take the difficult roads, and do the things that are hard. We argue and squabble and hate each other, we spend our time trying to tear down what others have built and instead of driving forward into a future that we have forged, we cower in fear. Instead of following the men and women of vision and daring, we listen to the counsel of those small minded fearful men who admonish us not to dream.
My son, like most of his generation, has no interest in space. His school, though a fine place it may be, does not have the classrooms decorated with pictures of the men and the ships and the planets and the stars. There are no big dreams, no great national goals to galvanize his generation.
For these kids it’s not that the dreams have died, it’s that they never were.
_______________________________________________________
"As I take man's last step from the surface, back home for some time to come — but we believe not too long into the future — I'd like to just say what I believe history will record, that America's challenge of today has forged man's destiny of tomorrow. And, as we leave the Moon at Taurus-Littrow, we leave as we came and, God willing, as we shall return, with peace and hope for all mankind. Godspeed the crew of Apollo 17."
- Eugene A. Cernan, Apollo 17 Commander.
- The last man to walk on the moon, December 14, 1972.
Hm. Guess I don't have to write the essay I was planning after all. You've said it better than I would have.
ReplyDeleteFor me, people have always been able to go to the moon. They just didn't want to. I was born after the first landing, and wasn't aware of the space program by the time of the last.
For me, Golden Age SF was mostly alternate history, or fantasy: we'd been there, and that wasn't what it was like.
For me, science is mostly inward - mapping the human genome, understanding the global climate, putting up satellites that look down - rather than the outward-looking science of the early space program.
I've never seen anything to compare with the tales I've heard of the global interest in the moon landing. The pop-culture spectacles that capture current global interest in no way compare. Science is too hard, the payoffs too far down the road.
The world went in directions that early SF authors never envisioned, but in doing so we sacrificed the drive that sent men to the moon. For me, that part too is alternate history, and I miss it.
This is the saddest thing I've read in quite some time, and that's saying something.
ReplyDeleteI had such high hopes for us as a species.
Sigh.
I'm amazed as well that we can expend so much energy and so many resources in hating each other and distrusting one another, and killing one another - if we could use just a quarter of that in coming together and helping one another, what a world this would be... We could easily have been on Mars by now.
ReplyDeleteYes, nobody wants to do the hard thing, though it's most often the more right thing. Sad.
Thanks, Jim - excellent piece.
Thanks, Karl. Both you and I are veterans and I doubt that you are any more a misty eyed pacifist than I am or under any illusion about the need for a strong military. However, once you can destroy the world a hundred times over, I think that's probably enough and maybe we should be spending our money on something a little more constructive. I'd like to leave my kid an unlimited future instead of a big pile of weapons that are only good for destroying the human race.
ReplyDeleteSince I spent most of my life defending this country, I made it my business to learn about the causes of war and conflict, and in almost all cases those causes can be directly traced to resources. Land, food, water, minerals, energy, fuel, raw materials, and breathing space. It's all out there, that and more, and a tenth of the energy we've expended on world ending weapons would have given it to us thirty years ago and done more to relieve the root causes of war and poverty than any weapon ever built or any war ever fought for whatever noble reason.
I find that sad and tragic and short sighted.
Thank you, Jim, you expressed what I had trouble doing through my rage that my local news service gave time to a landing-denier. I wasn't just appalled as an American, I was appalled as a human being. This denies one of the most profound achievements we humans have yet attained. It's up there with fire, the wheel, language, writing, law, civilization, diplomacy, germ theory of sanitation, indoor plumbing, electricity, and many of the other profound and incredible achievements we humans have accomplished.
ReplyDeleteAnd I'm still enraged that we're still hamstrung by monkeys struggling for their bananas. If we don't get off this rock we'll die here.
I want us to be humans and not monkeys, but I guess we'll see if we're the missing link or not.
Mensley (fatoudust),
ReplyDeleteMy response to a landing denier (Virgil) on Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy site (actually this response was to a guy who felt we were being rude to a landing denier conspiracy nut):
______________________________
Rude is when someone like Virgil insists on regurgitating his special brand of crap, despite the fact that it has been thoroughly debunked by every credible agency on the planet - most notably by our host here [Astronomer Phil Plait, who has thoroughly examined each and every claim by the Landing Hoax retards]
Rude is insisting that this type of cockamamie garbage be given equal consideration with actual reality.
Rude is claiming, repeatedly in every forum he can reach, that those brave men, heroes all, the 30 men who have flown to the moon and the 12 men who walked upon its surface and all of the astronauts and cosmonauts of all nations before and since, and all of those tens of thousands men and women who worked tirelessly to complete the engineering, to build the ships, to monitor and guide the missions all over the world, and right on down to those Navy Sailors who waited out there on the sea to recover the returning missions, and all of those scientists who worked on the moon samples, and all of those historians who have analyzed every second of those moon missions are nothing more than liars and frauds and charlatans.
That’s rude, T. Wilde. That’s obnoxious to a degree that simply defies description. That’s rudeness that verges on pathology and a degree of delusion that should quite possibly belong in an institution.
The Apollo missions are events that rival the greatest in all human history. They defined who we, as Americans, once were - and could be again. More than that, those missions defined who the entire human race could be, if they set their mind to it. Those missions brought the entire world together in awestruck amazement at the shear gobsmacking glory men could achieve if they only dare to do so.
People like Virgil dismiss all of that out of hand. They dismiss the decades of work and struggle and persistence. They dismiss the ultimate sacrifice by men such Grissom, White, and Chaffee - men who believed in what they were doing so much that they gave their very lives to the program. Virgil, with his childish misunderstanding of basic science, dismisses all those who have the courage to ride the rocket, and all of those who died proving that it could be done - from the test pilots of the 60’s to those who died in both shuttle accidents, to those despite the losses still strap themselves into the shuttle and the soyuz and ride those ships into orbit. They dismiss the iron dedication of men such as Gene Kranz, and the brilliance of uncounted and unsung engineers and scientists and the average assembly line workers at Rockwell and Grumman and Northrup who felt honor and pride as Americans to build the ships that would take men to the stars.
People like Virgil would condescendingly explain inertia to an astronomer such as Phil Plait - and get it utterly wrong and yet continue to blunder on clueless.
Virgil and the rest of his ilk deserve no respect whatsoever. He has none for himself and none for the hundreds of thousands he so casually calls liars and frauds and fakes. He, and those like him, deserve nothing more than ridicule and scorn and contempt.
Thank you, Jim, that was excellent!
ReplyDeleteHonestly, I seem to have emotionally moved beyond the denier crap.
I now seem to be at the point where my previous post left off.
Okay, what now?
What do those of us who understand that we need to leave earth do?
Some of us would like to not be monkeys fighting over bananas.
Perfectly said, as usual, Jim!
ReplyDeleteWhat now?
ReplyDeleteNow we acknowledge that we will never be the ones to ride the rocket. The best we can hope for is that our children will have a greater vision.
Now we teach the next generation to dream and desire and want the stars and take risks and to run with their heads up, instead of plodding along looking at their feet.
Now we elect those who would also dream and desire and want the stars and who would lead us beyond this small blue marble. Those who would give us hope and inspire us and lead us to the stars. We vote for the things that will give our kids the future.
I'll say this, I believe in the power of the human spirit. Somebody, somehow, someway is going to go back to the moon, then they're going to go on to Mars, they're going to build colonies up there and they're going to have kids and they are going to be humanity's future. If it's not Americans, it will be somebody - somebody with something to prove and a will to do so, most likely the Chinese or maybe the Indians. We can either rise to that challenge and beat them along the path that we pioneered OR we can join them and live up to the promise of that message on the side of Apollo 11's descent stage OR we can join the dinosaurs and Rome and the British Empire in the dust bin of history.
There really aren't a lot of other options.
Thank you, Jim. It's a relief to know what I think and how I feel about what happened to our space program -- on our watch, no less -- isn't just limited to me.
ReplyDeleteJim, I replied over at Giant Midgets to your comment there. I'll add this here: your post is as excellent as always, but we disagree to some extent (as you're aware). I'll also add that I don't know if the failure you mention is merely the failure of the manned space program. As I mentioned in my response at my place, I did have big dreams inspired by the Voyagers' flybys of the trans-asteroidal planets, and I wasn't alone (Sir Arthur C. Clarke, among others, drew much inspiration from the data and images). I was a kid at the time, and to the extent that science wasn't a huge subject for all the kids, I think one can blame the general anti-intellectual currents in American culture that arose from the mistrust of industry by the extreme left and fear of science from the extreme right.
ReplyDeleteThe intellectual climate of the fifties and sixties wasn't just the space program: it was the postwar mentality that held that science helped win WWII and rebuild Europe and would defeat the Soviets. The mentality that built NASA was also the mentality that lost the Vietnam War, a loss that contributed to a pervasive lack of faith in wonks (whether they were rocket scientists or worked in the Department of Defense). And the anti-intellectual climate of the '70s and '80s (and '90s and '00s--how did we ever have a President of the United States who bragged about making mediocre grades at Yale?) has hurt NASA's budgets, but to blame the failures of the space program would be reversing cause and effect.
I think photos taken by robots could inspire--if it was cool to be inspired by robots and alien vistas. I don't think the state of American culture would be changed if it was a man or woman taking the picture, though. Science classes are apathetic cesspools because we live in a culture where a sizeable chunk of the population believes that teaching evolution is a First Amendment issue that involves two whole sides, or that every study and metastudy that fails to show a link between vaccines and autism must be suspect because of anecdotal evidence proffered by a former Playmate and MTV starlet who's now a mommy and therefore must know things.
Hell, Jim, if your kid's science teacher even dared to tell his class that an astronaut had just set foot on a million-year-old dried-up Martian floodplain, he'd have to worry about being sued for not also explaining that said floodplain was possibly only 6,000 years old.
I'd like to leave my kid an unlimited future instead of a big pile of weapons that are only good for destroying the human race.
ReplyDeleteExactly - My son and I still think about the maybes of going to Mars - we'd both volunteer... Yeah, we're on the same page here.
Spent much of yesterday watching both old and new shows on History Channel and Discovery about Apollo 11. The thought that a man like Gene Kranz could ever make shit up and not actually do it -- is unthinkable.
ReplyDeleteThey re-ran the Mythbusters episode where they debunked some of the anti-moonlanding claims -- and all the while I was looking for flaws in their presentation, wary that they'd do or say something which the voracious hordes of idiots would latch on to keep their denial hopes alive.
Holocaust deniers, Moon landing deniers, Science deniers -- so much energy expended on such useless crap. Noise which makes it difficult for legitimate people to come forward and propose projects. To propose dreams to enrich our society and culture and our very lives, not spurn it or grind it back into the dirt.
As I said on my Apollo 11 posting -- I was there. I was there, Walter Cronkite was there. Everyone I knew was there.
I was always mad that Nixon talked to the astronauts on the Moon. Not because the President of the United States called. But because Nixon was able to bask in a moment he did not create -- and knew he would be patting them on the back, say "Well done", then gut the program.
I am, and probably always will be conflicted about Nixon's place in our history. But in terms of our space efforts, Nixon was a man of small vision. And that one I'll hang on his door.
Dr. Phil
If the human race is to have any hope of a future, part of it has to be "out there." Millions of resources--including ones we might never have considered--are likely out there waiting to be discovered and exploited. My father has long said that private enterprise was most likely the key to actual space exploration and exploitation, but I'm not so sure. Fact is, despite some liberal positions (namely, "we've got so much better things to spend money on down here"). This may be partially true but ignores the long view completely. Science got us into this mess... we can't get out of it by abandoning science. The only way through is forward, the only way forward is through.
ReplyDeleteThanks Jim. As a product of 1961, I too watched and wondered in amazement at what our country was achieving in space. Whole segments of our childhood revolved around space related things. We were in California on that magical moment in July 1969. I remember my dad saying to my brother and I the night before as we gazed at the moon, that tomorrow was the big day. It was a reminder not needed for we knew exactly the time of the event and like most of the world wouldn't miss it for anything. To witness the event will remain a lifelong treasure. How true and sad that we have spent literally trillions to design and manufacture devices to vaporize the human race when those trillions could have been used to advance the human race. Sadly it revolves around money and profits at the moment and still does, nowhere is there the solid vision of our future as humans. As I write this, the last shuttle has been retired and I know I will never achieve the dream I had as a kid growing up in the 60's of going to space. Not even sure if my kids will either. Thanks for your ability to tell it as it is, you are a Saint of Sanity for many of us and may your pen and thoughts continue full speed ahead. Signed, Sitka Star Gazer (geezer as my kids would say)
ReplyDeleteThank you Jim, for making this post available as we celebrate the life and mourn the death of Neil Armstrong. I fervently hope that in reviewing his history we can rekindle some of that hope and enthusiasm for exploration and for reaching for the unknown. Although I never met Neil Armstrong, I am fortunate to live in the city, Wapakoneta, OH, that claims him as our native son. He was a member of St. Paul United Church of Christ to which I also belong. Wapakoneta has an excellent small museum built in Neil Armstrong's honor, with many items from his life and honoring all of Ohio's astronauts. Visit us sometime. I'll even buy you dinner and a beer.
ReplyDelete